Avi Eisenberg Detained Unlike SBF As Mango Labs Is Denied Injunction But TRO to March 15
SDNY COURTROOM, March 10 - In the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 27, 2022 a complaint was ordered unsealed charging Avraham Eisenberg with commodities fraud. He was arrested in Puerto Rico.
On January 9, Inner City Press came across the CFTC case against Eisenberg, just filed (still with no title in PACER) and put it out on Patreon here. The 21-page civil complaint is, as is often the case, more detailed...
The same day the criminal complaint was unsealed, Inner City Press repeatedly checked the SDNY Magistrates Court but it was locked. But the complaint in this case charges that Eisenberg "engaged in a scheme involving the intentional and artificial manipulation of the price of perpetual futures contracts on a cryptocurrency exchange called Mango Markets... which has its own native crypto token called MNGO."
The unsealed complaint is now on Patreon here
On January 30, 2023, District Judge Liman held a hearing on Mango Labs LLC's order to show cause - but no one was there for Eisenberg. In fat, Inner City Press was the only person in the courtroom gallery. Here's some tweets here.
On February 3, Eisenberg in a yellow jump suit and feet shackled was brought into Magistrates Court at SDNY. He had, at least for the proceeding, the same lawyer Ethereum developer Virgil Griffith had in the North Korea sanctions case he pled guilty in: Brian Klein.
His parents were in the gallery and he looked at them, from two rows away. The prosecutor said that (unlike on Sam Bankman-Fried) they were seeking detention, and that he was consenting at least for now. Here is Inner City Press' thread.
There's more detail on Patreon here.
On February 14, there was a very brief arraignment, thread here:
OK- now at arraignment of Avi Eisenberg, who unlike Sam Bankman-Fried is in detention, brought in by Marshals in a yellow prison jumpsuit.
Judge Berman: How do you plead?
EISENBERG: Not guilty.
Klein (who repped Virgil Griffith): We are being retained. Judge: March 14 at 1 pm. That's it.
This next session, now described as a bond hearing, came up on February 24 during an hour and a half argument in Mango Labs v. Eisenberg before Judge Lewis J. Liman. Inner City Press live tweeted, thread here:
OK- now in Mango Labs v Avi Eisenberg, preliminary injunction argument. Mango Labs accuses EIsenberg of "unlawful threat."
Judge Liman: This is about tokens, but could just as easily be about securities. Couldn't the individual tokenholders have sued?
Mango Labs' Morrison (MoFo) counsel: it was duress. They were skitish he would just run off
MoFo: He used the passport of a Ukrainian woman to open an account on a third party exchange to pump the price of Mango. He is a criminal - Judge: He is presumed innocent
Eisenberg's lawyer: At first we didn't know much about Mango Labs...We still question their standing.
MoFo: Eisenberg is a bot trader, the assets can move even though he's locked up in Essex [Eisenberg's civil counsel says bond hearing March 14]
Ultimately Judge Liman extended the TRO for two weeks, after for two letters by Tuesday, and said he will rule on March 10.
On March 10, Inner City Press was there, thread here:
OK - now in court for ruling in Mango Labs v Avi Eisenberg, empty gallery unlike for #SBF in an hour.
Judge Liman: I will give you my decision on the requested injunction, orally. Of $114 million, he returned $67 million. There are 4 causes of action: fraud, duress. There is a criminal case and defendant is detained. The US seeks forfeiture.
Judge Liman: The Court ordered service on defendant Eisenberg upon his arrival in NY [from detention in Puerto Rico]. DOJ has also been notified by Mango Labs, but has not intervened. I find Mango Labs has standing...
Judge Liman: The settlement agreement with Mango DAO does not preclude Mango Labs' standing. NY law applies here. On the preliminary injuction factors, I find plaintiff has NOT shown a likelihood of success on the merits. [NOT- Mango Labs failed on factor 1]
Judge Liman: Can the settlement be voided as the product of duress? No - the token holders rejected an initial proposal. They exercised their free will. And it was later ratified, constructively.
Judge Liman: Eisenberg's alleged use of a Ukrainian woman's identity does not change the duress or fraud analysis. [But may be used in criminal prosecution]
Judge Liman: Nor has there been a showing of irreparable harm. [Mango Labs' "Big Law" counsel has chin in hands. On the courtroom coat rack, a red scarf emblazoned LFC - Liverpool Football Club. Come on, you reds]
Judge Liman: All three factors fail. Preliminary injunction is denied. Mango Labs' lawyer: Continue TRO 7 days, to tell DOJ? We may appeal
Judge: OK- until March 15. And next conference April 17.
Your support means a lot. As little as $5 a month helps keep us going and grants you access to exclusive bonus material on our Patreon page. Click here to become a patron.