Matthew Russell Lee’s Newsletter

Share this post

User's avatar
Matthew Russell Lee’s Newsletter
Extra: In Charlie Javice Feb 18 Trial For Fooling JPMC Jury Not Required to Distinguish Capital One
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

Extra: In Charlie Javice Feb 18 Trial For Fooling JPMC Jury Not Required to Distinguish Capital One

Continued thread on X for Subscriber here and below the paywall (subscribe / support) line here

Matthew Russell Lee / ICP's avatar
Matthew Russell Lee / ICP
Feb 04, 2025
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

User's avatar
Matthew Russell Lee’s Newsletter
Extra: In Charlie Javice Feb 18 Trial For Fooling JPMC Jury Not Required to Distinguish Capital One
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
Share

by Matthew Russell Lee, Patreon Book Substack

SDNY COURTHOUSE, Feb 4– JPMorgan Chase bought a start-up called Frank, which claimed to have 4 million students signed up to file their FAFSA forms, for $175 million. Then Chase learned Frank had only 300,000 customers.

On April 4, 2023, Frank founder Ms. Charlie Javice was brought before U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Magistrate Judge Barbara C. Moses and was freed on $2 million bond.

On January 24, 2025 Inner City Press published the first book on the case, Fintech Fraudster? here

Inner City Press live tweeted the more than two hour hearing on January 23, here. Trial was delayed one week to February 18; the motion to sever was denied. The basis for the delay was late production of Amar's Google Drive, which Judge Alvin Hellerstein criticized.

On January 27 Javice argued for inclusion of her two expert witnesses, Ms. Carla Holtze Ceel on digital analytics, and Dr. Konstantinos Psounis on "the role of synthetic data."

On January 28 Javice and Amar filed a motion to compel JPM Chase to disclose the names of 145 employee they claimed did not use messaging applications for work.

On January 31, Chase's lawyers at Davis Polk opposed giving any names, arguing that the request for names was "for the sole purpose of impeaching prospective Government witnesses."

On February 4 the defendants reduced their request to eight staffers. Full thread here, including

Judge Hellerstein: Who was the second bank?

Amar's lawyer: Capital One. But shouldn't the jury have to decide whether Capital One or JPM Chase was the one they say was defrauded?

Judge: Motion denied. Figure out who'll speak

Continued thread on X for Subscriber here and below the paywall (subscribe / support) line here

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Matthew Russell Lee’s Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Matthew Russell Lee / ICP
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More